This guidance note is for government and civil society organisations working on disaster risk reduction (DRR)initiatives at community level, in partnership with
vulnerable communities. It shows what a ‘disaster-resilient community’ might consist of, by setting out the many different elements of resilience.
It also provides some ideas about how to progress towards resilience.
The version of the guidance note you are reading is a pilot version, based on a desk study and discussions with experts. This is now being tested in the field and it will be revised in the light of those experiences. Everyone is welcome to use the note,
and feedback is similarly welcome.
Showing posts with label Resilient Communities. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Resilient Communities. Show all posts
Thursday, August 16, 2012
How to Build Disaster Resilient Communities
Healthy cities continuously grow by driving
economic development while protecting cultural heritage. Success, in
part, depends on a healthy built environment that is rooted in
contemporary urban planning, sustainability and disaster resilience. Our
job, as design professionals, is to provide a built environment that
supports all of those goals. Our designs need to be efficient,
economical, adaptive, sustainable, and disaster resilient. We are doing
well on all fronts except for the last. We need to develop, and include
in the code, provisions that will provide the buildings and lifelines
needed to support disaster resilience.
Resilient communities have a credible disaster
response plan that assures a place and ability to govern after a
disaster has struck. Their power, water, and communication networks
begin operating again shortly after a disaster and people can stay in
their homes, travel to where they need to be, and resume a fairly normal
living routine within weeks. The return to a "new" normal can then
occur within a few years. While every building should protect its
occupants from harm, a select few buildings need to remain operational
and a larger group needs to be at least usable during repair. Lifeline
systems must be restored quickly to support response and reconstruction.
Monday, August 13, 2012
Resilient City
by David R. Godschalk
This paper proposes a comprehensive strategy of urban hazard mitigation aimed at the creation of resilient cities, able to withstand both types of threats. The paper reviews hazard mitigation practice, defines a resilient city, considers the relationship between resilience and terrorism, and discusses why resilience is important and how to apply its principles to physical and social elements of cities. Contending that current hazard mitigation policy, practice, and knowledge fail to deal with the unique aspects of cities under stress, the paper recommends a major resilient cities initiative, including expanded urban systems research, education and training, and increased collaboration among professional groups involved in city building and hazard mitigation.
This paper proposes a comprehensive strategy of urban hazard mitigation aimed at the creation of resilient cities, able to withstand both types of threats. The paper reviews hazard mitigation practice, defines a resilient city, considers the relationship between resilience and terrorism, and discusses why resilience is important and how to apply its principles to physical and social elements of cities. Contending that current hazard mitigation policy, practice, and knowledge fail to deal with the unique aspects of cities under stress, the paper recommends a major resilient cities initiative, including expanded urban systems research, education and training, and increased collaboration among professional groups involved in city building and hazard mitigation.
What is a disaster resilient community?
At a seminar supported by the Thomas Jefferson Information Center,
University of North Carolina’s Dr. Gavin Smith, executive director of
the Center of Natural Hazards and Disasters, confirms, “The notion of
trying to predict vulnerability is not a perfect science. We are going
to see intensification of storms due to climate change.” But although no
amount of careful planning can prevent damage brought about by more
destructive natural calamities, building disaster-resilient communities
should be the ideal.
“I always use ‘natural hazard’ instead of ‘disaster’ because disasters are a human construct,” Dr. Smith explains, “But at this time, climate change is a disaster. Many communities will not recover to pre-disaster conditions and we need to find a way to adapt to natural hazards.”
“I always use ‘natural hazard’ instead of ‘disaster’ because disasters are a human construct,” Dr. Smith explains, “But at this time, climate change is a disaster. Many communities will not recover to pre-disaster conditions and we need to find a way to adapt to natural hazards.”
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)